Archive

Archive for December, 2010

Complete Streets vs. Reality in Michigan

December 15th, 2010 Comments off
Future roadway designs will be context sensitive

Future roadway designs will be context sensitive

New Michigan legislation now requires future roadways to be planned and designed in a complete streets, context sensitive manner. This has brought up several topics of conversation.

The starting point on any road project now assumes that all types of transportation modes are justified on a given roadway unless you can show otherwise.  So rather than adding bike lanes, bus lanes, sidewalks, etc., those are built-in unless a case can be made to not include them in the highway cross section.  Each transportation corridor will be different and each will need to be considered with respect to the movement needs of all right of way users, the adjacent property uses, and visions for future corridor changes.

This approach creates a bit of friction when major new development or redevelopment project teams meet with County road commissions and local roadway agencies regarding the goals of any improvements to area roadways. This is really quite an interesting shift in thinking and clearly NOT something that our local County road commission has fully bought into as yet.

They likely will not have a choice though.  All transportation improvement projects in Michigan now must consider and implement the complete streets, context sensitive solutions.  So we may see that their rule regarding levels of service for all traffic movements have to be level D or better is amended.  Level of service E and F are going to be okay if they last for a relatively short period of time and do not present safety hazards to all right of way users. 

The new assumptions get at the same argument as the one we have seen about a sea of parking outside a shopping center. Providing parking spaces based on peak demand needed only a few times per year is dumb. So is designing streets for peak hour traffic. Why not design the roads to function properly for a multitude of users all the time? Let the peak hour traffic back up, let drivers select alternate parallel routes, or alternate modes of transportation, or alternate timing of their travels, or use designs like roundabouts that slow but maintain the flow while greatly reducing serious accidents.

To read a five-page summary of the complete streets context sensitive approach to roadway design, go here

To order the current recommended practice “Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares:  A Context Sensitive Approach” from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, please call 202.289.0222 and ask for publication # RP-036A.

Capital Outlay Bill is On Governor Granholm’s Desk

December 6th, 2010 Comments off

For the first time since fiscal year 2008, it seems likely the state of Michigan will have a higher education capital outlay program.

The Michigan state legislature on Friday, December 3 passed a higher education capital outlay bill for fiscal year 2011 which began in October.  Now we wait for Governor Granholm to sign the bill.

To many of us in the A/E community, this is a surprise.  With all the talk about budget deficits in Michigan, our dreams of new state-financed higher education construction projects seemed dim.  But House Bill 5858 was passed on Friday and in it are several key projects receiving planning authorizations.  Higher education projects receiving planning authorization include:

  • CMU – bio-sciences buildin
  • GVSU – classroom and office additions
  • Lake State – school of business building
  • MSU – plant science facilities-bioeconomy project
  • NMU – Jamrich Hall modernization
  • OU – engineering center
  • UM – Ann Arbor – GG Brown
  • UM – Flint – Murchie science lab renovations
  • UM – Dearborn – science and computer information science building
  • WSU – bio-medical research building
  • Alpena CC – electrical power technology center
  • Bay de Noc CC – nursing lab and lecture hall remodeling
  • Delta College – health and wellness project
  • Gobebic CC – building renovations
  • Grand rapids CC – Cook academic hall renovation
  • Jackson CC – student services project
  • Lansing CC – arts and sciences building
  • Macomb CC – health science and technology building
  • Mid-Michigan CC – Mt. Pleasant campus unification project
  • North Central Michigan CC – health education and science center project

Along with these planning authorizations, Henry Ford CC, Ferris State University and Monroe County CC received construction authorizations.

Officials at EMU were disappointed to see that Strong Hall was omitted from the list.  Strong Hall has been on EMU’s priority list for several years.

Several of these institutions have already chosen A/E teams for their planning and programming projects.