development issues in Ann Arbor

Posts Tagged ‘development issues in Ann Arbor’

MCLLC Proves To Be a Reliable Consultant to the University of Michigan

August 9th, 2012 No comments
East Quad, University of Michigan

East Quad, University of Michigan

Excuse us for boasting! 

We couldn’t be more proud of the relationship we have developed over the years providing civil engineering services to the University of Michigan.  It’s long-term professional relationships like these that distinguish MCLLC from other civil engineering firms in southeast Michigan.

The University recently announced over $1 billion of current and future construction projects on their Ann Arbor campus.  News reports specifically mentioned nine major current or proposed projects; on five of these MCLLC provided either site development civil engineering or 3-D laser scanning services.  We did topographic surveying near the new entrance to Crisler Arena; we provided extensive site civil engineering services at the Institute for Social Research and at the GG Brown Memorial Laboratory.  We also provided topographic land survey services for the renovation project at the Wall Street parking garage.

Our services were provided either directly to the University Architect’s office or the Office of Architecture Engineering and Construction or indirectly through the University’s lead architectural firms.  In each case our work has been done promptly and on budget. 

Providing reliable, accurate civil engineering and site surveying services is the foundation of our business.  Long-term relationships with important, high visibility clients like the University of Michigan are a result of those efforts.

Ann Arbor City Ordinance: Content vs. Intent

January 25th, 2012 Comments off

Parking ordinance trouble?

Some zoning ordinances are subject to the rule of unintended consequences. The intent is often not codified in a way that anticipates every possible application of the ordinance requirements. An example is the Ann Arbor Off-street Parking ordinance intended to prevent parking between commercial buildings and adjacent rights-of-way. 

Our client owns a shopping center in a C3/Commercial zoning district with frontage on three public streets. A remodeling project is proposed to construct entries on a blank face of the center and add parking between the building and the street.

City planning staff opposed parking in this location because the “intent” of Chapter 59 is to require buildings to be located close to front property lines with parking in side or rear yards. We argued that the “content” of the ordinance is the controlling factor and that the ordinance includes an exception for sites with multiple frontages.  We submitted a Zoning Compliance Permit Application.

Chapter 59, Section 5:168, item (2) c, describes an exception to the prohibition of parking between the building and the street. “Sites with more than 1 front line; the requirements of paragraph (1) in this section shall apply to only 1 front lot line. For all other lot lines abutting streets, parking shall be located behind the minimum front setback requirement, per Chapter 55 (Zoning).”

That paragraph reads “Vehicular parking structures, lots and space shall not be located in the front open space. No space within a parking structure or lot may be closer to the street than the front face of a building.”

  1. The site has frontage on three public streets.

Item (2) c applies and requires that only 1 of the frontage cannot have parking between the building and the street.

The preliminary site concept showed proposed improvements including removal of all parking spaces between the building and one of the other two frontages, one that is functionally a rear yard.  Removing that parking makes that frontage comply with paragraph (1). The front line adjacent to proposed parking no longer has to meet that requirement.

  1. The other two front lines are not subject to paragraph (1) and are subject to the requirement that “parking shall be located behind the minimum front setback requirement” which is 10 feet.

The Zoning Compliance Application was approved. The City immediately began the process of changing Chapter 59 to revise the ordinance to require a minimum 25 foot setback rather than the 10 minimum permitted in the C3 district.

We submitted a Site Plan that showed a minimum 25 foot parking setback and that was unanimously approved.

Ann Arbor’s student housing project 42 North dead?

November 30th, 2011 Comments off

What’s disappointing about all this is that the site plan was approved three-years ago.  Why now after many meetings and changes ecide that things are not moving forward? 

Things would go much more smoothly if planning commission and city council members could keep in mind that time is money and that a constantly moving site plan target is very hard to pin down.

The following is from www.annarbor.com, October 12, 2011:

A controversial student apartment project known as 42 North is no longer moving forward, according to Ann Arbor officials.

Wendy Rampson, the city’s planning manager, told members of the Planning Commission Tuesday night the project site plan — approved three years ago by a 7-4 vote of the Ann Arbor City Council — has expired and the property owner isn’t seeking an extension now.

The project called for construction of five buildings on a 15-acre site owned by Grace Bible Church, off South Maple Road near Pauline Boulevard on the city’s west side. It would have included 494 parking spaces, a number far in excess of that required by city code.

42_North_map.jpg

When the site plan expired recently after three years without activity, Rampson said the church, acting as the applicant, came in seeking an extension.”And then they found that they were going to have to make significant changes to the plan in order to meet our new codes and opted not to do that,” she said.

Rampson said the developer of the site never exercised its option to purchase the property, and the church was hoping to extend the site plan to make it available to a future developer.

A representative of the church could not be reached for comment.

Controversial Ann Arbor Apartments Gain Approval

November 16th, 2011 Comments off

The controversial Varsity apartment complex to rise up next to the First Baptist Church on Washington Street in downtown Ann Arbor has gained final site plan approval from the Ann Arbor City Council.   Construction will begin this fall and is slated to open in late summer 2013.

See the full article from www.annarbor.com here.

New Underground Garage Gets Green Creds

October 4th, 2011 Comments off

Midwestern Consulting provided civil engineering services for the Ann Arbor underground garage currently being constructed next to the District Library at Fifth and William in downtown Ann Arbor.

We saw this recent article in  AnnArbor.com and thought the green credentials it has earned was very important.

Ann Arbor’s South Fifth Avenue underground parking structure has been recognized as a “Demonstrator Site” by the Green Parking Council.

Ann Arbor Downtown Development Authority officials announced the news, pointing out the designation means the parking structure — still in the process of being built — now will be among the first facilities eligible for Green Garage certification in 2012.

“The DDA has worked throughout his project to minimize its environmental impacts,” Amber Miller, the DDA’s planning and research specialist, wrote in an email to AnnArbor.com. “Our efforts now allow this structure to become part of this unique program designed to encourage the standardization of sustainable initiatives within the parking industry.”
underground_parking_September_2011.jpgFrom the top floor of the Ann Arbor District Library, the view of the new downtown underground parking structure taking shape on Thursday Photo by Ryan J. Stanton | AnnArbor.com

The Green Parking Council is a nonprofit group dedicated to expanding green parking practices through its Green Garage rating system. It developed the Demonstrator Site program as an evaluative tool to initiate the process toward Green Garage certification.”The GPC has created the Demonstrator Site program to bring recognition to those facilities that have committed to making an effort towards sustainability and who have made progress towards this end,” the group’s website states.

Miller cited several examples of the project’s commitment to sustainable practices. For instance, the excavated sand from the site is being reused as part of the structural concrete for the project, and all demolished concrete, asphalt and wood from the site has been recycled.

Also, all of the stormwater that falls on the site will be detained, in excess of city requirements, and energy-saving lights will be used that can cast lower light levels in off-peak periods.

When the structure opens, it’s expected to include 22 electric car charging stations and set aside prime parking spaces for alternative fueled vehicles.

DDA officials said this represents only the latest in a number of DDA initiatives to promote sustainability as a part of downtown development.

The DDA also has committed nearly $500,000 toward a program providing energy saving audits, recommendations and installation rebates to downtown businesses. DDA officials said the program has encouraged downtown building owners to make nearly $700,000 worth of improvements that are anticipated to save $87,000 a year in energy costs.

The DDA also has played a role in alternative transportation programs by covering 95 percent of the cost for the popular go!pass — a free bus pass for 7,100 employees — as well as bike hoops and lockers, commuter rail research, Zipcar sponsorship, and the getDowntown program. Additionally, the DDA provided the funds for the installation of a solar-electric demonstration project at the Farmers Market, downtown LED street lights, energy efficient upgrades at the Delonis Center and downtown sidewalk recycling containers.